top of page

The Internet Belonged to Everyone Once. It Could Again.

  • Writer: Alexis Goodreau
    Alexis Goodreau
  • Feb 24
  • 3 min read
A person in a black coat faces ornate doors with gold and teal floral and geometric designs, two different atmospheres.

I’ve been online long enough to remember Myspace. Like, actually remember it... the custom layouts, the top eight drama, spending forty-five minutes (at least) clicking through your favorite bands' pages while picking your profile song. Nobody was “building a personal brand.” We were just out here with our feelings and a dial-up connection, and somehow it felt like the internet belonged to us.


That feeling didn’t last, obviously. But I’ve been thinking about it a lot lately because - and I want to be careful about how I say this - I haven’t felt this excited about being online since then. Maybe more excited.


And the reason is AI.


I know. I know how that sounds.


So before I get into why I’m genuinely lit up about this moment in our lives, I want to talk about the part that’s harder, because I think it actually deserves more than a disclaimer.


AI data centers use a significant amount of water to keep their systems cool. That’s not speculation - it’s documented. And in some regions, that water draw is happening in communities that are already dealing with drought, already watching their aquifers drop. The people absorbing the biggest impact are often not the people seeing the biggest benefit. That’s a real harm. The displacement of creative workers through AI-generated content is also real. These aren’t things I’m interested in tucking into a footnote.


So where does that leave someone like me - someone who works in AI strategy and genuinely believes in what these tools can do?


It's a difficult question to debate with myself, but here’s where I keep landing: it leaves me with a responsibility, not a contradiction.


The solution to AI’s environmental footprint isn’t individual opt-out. Honestly, my personal decision to stop using (insert your own favorite LLM here) tomorrow would have essentially zero impact on a data center’s water consumption. That’s just the math. What actually moves the needle is policy, corporate accountability, pressure on the companies building this infrastructure, and real investment in better cooling technology. Those are the levers. Collective use doesn’t have to mean collective guilt, but it does mean we have to stay in the conversation, not check out of it.


What I can do - and what I think any of us operating in this space can do - is use these tools with enough intention that they actually earn their footprint. Not treating AI like a novelty. Not generating content just to generate content. Using it in ways that close gaps rather than widen them, especially for people who don’t have teams of consultants or agencies behind them.


And okay, here comes the part I get genuinely excited about.


What I’m watching happen right now reminds me of those early internet days, except the stakes are higher and (I really do believe this) the potential reach is bigger. The gap between what a well-resourced business can do and what a solo operator or small team can do is narrowing in ways that I did not even dream of seeing in my career. A blue-collar contractor who’s excellent at their trade but has never had a marketing team can now get real support building their proposals, their follow-ups, their whole client communication process. A first-generation entrepreneur who’s always had the ideas but never had the infrastructure can now actually build something that works.


Most people I talk to don’t realize yet what’s actually available to them. That genuinely surprises me every time.


I’m not naive about who captures these tools first - we’ve seen how tech rollouts go, and it’s not usually the people who need them most. But I’m not willing to hand the whole conversation over to the cynics, or to the people who’ve already figured out how to consolidate the gains for themselves. There’s real work to be done helping everyday people understand what’s available and how to use it in ways that serve their actual lives.

That’s the work I’m in.


That’s why I’m paying attention to the ethics - not because I want to perform accountability, but because the tools only live up to their potential if we’re honest about what they cost and intentional about how we use them. I’m excited about this moment. I also think it asks something of us. Honestly? I think that’s part of what makes it worth showing up for.

 
 
 

2 Comments


giecphangqua.n.h.g.h.u.n.g
6 days ago

Mình mua vé số chủ yếu cho vui, coi như giải trí thôi chứ không đặt nặng chuyện phải trúng. Trước đây nghe bạn bè bàn về “cầu” này nọ, mình cũng nửa tin nửa ngờ, nhưng thỉnh thoảng để ý lại thấy có vài dạng hay lặp nên cũng tò mò hơn. Mỗi lần đọc mấy nhận định, mình thường ghi lại vài ý ngắn gọn rồi chờ kết quả để so xem có phải mình đang tự huyễn hoặc không. Dạo gần đây mình hay mở https://soicauxsmb.io/so-ket-qua-200-ngay.html để nhìn lại dữ liệu cho rõ ràng hơn, đỡ cảm giác đoán mò. Có hôm trúng được chút thì vui, nhưng cũng nhiều bữa lệch hẳn nên mình tự nhắc…

Like

jennysilva3.2.3.12
Aug 08

Mình đọc mấy bài soi cầu cũng kha khá thời gian rồi, coi như thêm một nguồn tham khảo chứ chẳng dám đặt niềm tin tuyệt đối. Hồi trước toàn chọn theo hên xui, trúng thì phấn khởi mà trượt thì dễ cáu, nên sau này mình đổi sang ghi chú lại những cặp hay xuất hiện rồi tự ngẫm xem có nhịp nào lặp lại không. Có đợt mình xem bài của Soi cầu Atrungroi, thấy họ nói về lô gan với cầu lặp theo kiểu dễ tiếp thu, nên mình thử làm theo hướng chọn ít số, đánh nhỏ để thử nghiệm. Kết quả lúc được lúc không, nhưng ít nhất mình thấy đầu óc đỡ bị kéo…

Like
bottom of page